Ten to twenty years ago, most runners were told to take one gel an hour and “don’t upset your stomach.” On paper that’s roughly 30–60 g of carbohydrate per hour and it mapped onto the old idea that the gut was the limiting factor, so conservative fueling felt safer.

Fast-forward to today and the picture is very different. At the sharp end of the sport, elites aim for 90–120+ g of carbohydrate per hour in long events, and plenty of sub-elites are following with great success. What changed? In short: better science, better products, and a new mindset. Research shows that when you use multiple transportable carbohydrates (glucose + fructose), you can increase absorption and oxidation beyond the old 60 g/h ceiling, pushing toward ~1.5–1.8 g/min (~90–108 g/h) and, for some, even higher—with performance benefits and fewer GI issues when practiced. Gatorade Sports Science Institute+1

Below, we’ll break down where we were vs where we are, how fueling changes performance, and how to actually train your gut to handle higher intakes.


1) From “one gel an hour” to 90–120 g/h

Then (c. 2005–2015): Common guidance for endurance events was ~30–60 g/h. That limit largely reflected the capacity of the SGLT1 glucose transporter in the small intestine. Feed only glucose (or maltodextrin) and you’ll saturate SGLT1; push harder and unabsorbed carbs linger in the gut → sloshing, cramps, bathroom stops. Taylor & Francis Online

Now: Mix glucose + fructose (which uses a different transporter, GLUT5) and you open a second “door” into the bloodstream, increasing exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates and delaying fatigue. That’s the basis for modern guidance: ~90 g/h for events ≥2.5–3 h, with many athletes tolerating 100–120 g/h when well trained. World Athletics’ ultra review explicitly summarizes ~90 g/h as a target for long runs and racing; applied lab work and field practice show the feasibility of going higher for some athletes. worldathletics.org+1

A recent lab study in highly trained endurance athletes even compared 120 g/h (fructose:glucose ≈ 0.8:1) vs 90 g/h (1:2) during a 3-h session. The higher intake boosted exogenous carb oxidation, supporting the idea that >90 g/h can be useful when gut-trained and logistically manageable. (Important: more is not automatically better—individual tolerance matters.) SpringerLink

Takeaway: The old ceiling was about single-sugar transport. The new ceiling reflects dual-transporter fueling, athlete-specific tolerance, and practice.


2) Why fueling this way feels (and is) faster

Carb availability governs pace. Ultras are mostly aerobic, but when you climb, surge, or just try to hold form late, you lean on carbohydrate. Keep a steady stream of carbs coming in and you spare glycogen, maintain higher power/pace, and reduce the depth of the late-race fade.

The brain runs better on fuel. Like it or not, ultras are cognitive. Technical descents, route choices, and nutrition/hydration decisions all degrade when blood glucose dips. Smoother, frequent fueling stabilizes cognition and helps you make better decisions when tired.

GI comfort is trainable. Many GI problems aren’t “bad luck”, they’re mismatch problems: intake too high for your current transporter capacity, too concentrated relative to fluid/sodium, or too “new” for race stress. With structured practice, the GI tract adapts—transporter expression, gastric emptying, and symptom tolerance all improve. Gatorade Sports Science Institute

Bottom line: Fueling isn’t a lifeline for when things go wrong; it is a performance strategy.


3) How to increase tolerance and gut-train (practical plan)

The gut adapts to the demands you place on it. Here’s a runner-friendly progression we use at Hungry Runner.

Step A — Set your starting point

Step B — Build gradually (over 6–8 weeks)

Evidence check: A two-week “gut-training” protocol with regular, deliberate high-carb intakes in training has been shown to improve GI comfort, raise blood glucose availability, and improve running performance outcomes vs untrained guts. Translation: practice works. SciSpace

Step C — Get the concentration and fluids right

Step D — Fuel early, then steady

Step E — Rehearse race fuels exactly

Step F — Learn your red and green flags

If red flags show up, ease down to the last comfortable rate (e.g., 90 g/h), switch format (drink → gel or vice versa), add a small sodium/water push, and resume smaller, more frequent sips. Practice these “resets” in training so they’re automatic on race day.


4) What about “real food”?

Real foods (bananas, rice balls, soft bars) can work well if they’re low fiber, low fat, and low protein during the running segment (save the savory/fatty items for walk breaks or aid station pauses). A recent narrative review notes that food-first strategies can perform comparably when carb delivery is matched and logistics are dialed in; the trade-off is precision and portability. For high intakes (≥90 g/h), drinks + gels are simply the easiest way to hit targets without overfilling the stomach. MDPI


5) A simple template you can copy


6) Mindset shift: fueling is training

The biggest change in ultrarunning nutrition isn’t the products it’s the mindset. We used to hope the gel would sit well; now we train our GI tract so race day feels routine. We used to treat fueling as “insurance”; now we recognize it as a way to maintain speed, preserve form, cognition, and mood.

If you’re stuck at 40–60 g/h because “my stomach can’t handle more,” that’s not a verdict it’s a training plan. Start conservative, build weekly, mix your carb sources, reset quickly if symptoms arise, and keep notes. Give yourself 6–8 weeks and you’ll be surprised how different your long runs feel.


8-Week Gut-Training Plan

(Recommended for runners targeting 90–110 g/h in 50–100 km events)

WeekLong Run Fuel TargetStructureFocus
160 g/h30 g every 30 minBasic tolerance
260–70 g/hAdd carb drinkCheck sweetness + texture preferences
375 g/h25 g every 20 minPractice fueling on climbs
475–85 g/hInclude gels + drink mixSodium timing test
590 g/h20 g every 13–15 minOne session with race pace efforts
690–100 g/hAdd caffeine trialGI response in heat
7100–110 g/hMix liquids + solidsAid station simulation
890–110 g/hRace rehearsalNail logistics + confidence

Sources and further reading

Subscribeto our newsletter